Kodak Tri-X and 35mm SLR — Best Value in Town

Nikon F100 - © Tim Layton Sr.As you can imagine I routinely get people from all over the world asking questions about getting started in black and white film photography.  My answer is always more or less the same.  A good place to start is to get any older 35mm camera from the 90′s (e.g., Nikon F100, N75, Canon EOS, etc) and a box of Kodak Tri-X 400 you are well on your way to taking some beautiful black and white photographs. If you have lenses for one manufacturer then that is your best path because while there may be subtle differences between manufacturers, they will all take great photographs.  I have shot both Canon and Nikon over the years and my personal preference is Nikon.  I have no affiliation with KEH.com, the worlds largest used camera dealer, but highly recommend them for buying used camera gear on a budget for a couple of reasons.  First, they are very conservative on how they rate their gear and you get a 6 month warranty to boot!  You can pick up a perfect condition 35mm film camera for less than $100 which is an absolute bargain.  Also one nice advantage of shooting with a 35mm film SLR is you get full frame photos.  No cropping of 1.5 for typical Nikon’s and 1.6 on Canon’s.  You will typically have to spend over $1,000 or more to get a full frame digital SLR camera and in comparison you can get a full frame film SLR for less than $100.  You decide which is best for you.

I recently went to the St. Louis Planetarium and to Forest Park.  I took these two photos using the Nikon F100 and Tri-X 400.  I used XTOL 1+1 as I typically do for all my 35mm film because I want the sharpest and finest grain as possible in the event I want to make an enlargement.  However, there are times when I want the enlarged grain for artistic purposes and I would typically use D76 stock for this scenario and push Tri-X a couple or even three stops to find the look I am going for.

On a side note I am routinely asked about maximum print size from 35mm negatives.  My answer is as follows.  I have made many 16×20 prints in the darkroom from 35mm negatives and if you follow the general guidance of slightly underexposing and using a fine grain developer such as XTOL you should get similar results.  If you want to scan your negatives and produce a digital print then you have no practical limitations.  If you want the best results today from your own scanner then I would recommend the Epson V750 Pro scanner and special film holder from betterscanning.com for optimum scans.  Using the V750 and the film holders from betterscanning.com I print 16×20 prints on my Epson 3880 with terrific results.  If you want larger prints from your 35mm negatives then I highly recommend the drum scanning services at West Coast Imaging (WCI).  You can literally make 50+” prints from their high resolution tango drum scans.

I would make two comments about the scanning and prints.  First, if you want to keep your costs to a minimum then a current model Canon or Epson scanner in the $150 dollar range will produce really nice scans and you could easily make 8×10 prints all day long with this combination.  If you want to make a huge enlargement from one of those home run images then WCI is the best option and of course the expense is much greater.

If you are just starting out or just want to play around with film then an inexpensive 35mm body from Nikon or Canon with a standard lens is a great place to start.  I recommend starting out with Tri-X because of its generous latitude for exposure errors and contrast.  It is also very easy to develop with wonderful shadow detail.  A current model flatbed scanner will give you good results and allow you to play around with the medium and let your creative side take over.  If you want to expand on your black and white film efforts then an entire world of medium and large format systems awaits you.

Photos

I selected to show you these two photos because of the contrast and tonal gradation that is possible with 35mm film.  The St. Louis Planetarium photo is a good example of this because you see the soft subtle tonal gradation of tones and shadows on the floor in the foreground and you also see the films ability to give you awesome contrast across the scene.  I also included an example of a landscape style photo from Forest Park that illustrates the ability of the 35mm camera and film combination to produce sharp photos.

1_091511_35mmtrix-xtol-edit 6_091511_35mmtrix-xtol-edit

 

Be sure to leave your comments or suggestions at the bottom of this article. If you like my articles be sure to use the “Like” or “Share” buttons located at the bottom of each article so we can get more feedback from other photographers.

Post your traditional darkroom prints to my new Flickr group dedicated to analog photographs in a digital world.

When viewing my photos on my website or anywhere on the Internet, be sure to check my monitor calibration page to ensure you have the best viewing experience.

To view my portfolio visit my Black and White Fine Art website.

You can follow me on Twitter and Facebook.

Tim Layton
Tim Layton Photography

© Tim Layton – All Rights Reserved – 2011. You may not republish or use any information or media of any format, in part or in whole, without my written permission. For permission and more information you can contact Tim Layton on the web at blog.timlaytonphotography.com or via email at tim@timlaytonphotography.com or via the telephone at 636.422.0002

Share

About Tim Layton

Tim Layton is a black and white fine art photographer that is dedicated to using film and other historic mediums to include paper negatives, dry plates, tintypes, and wetplate collodion in the making of his unique artwork. Tim hosts a film blog at blog.blackandwhitefineart.net and a vintage large format blog at www.vintagelargeformat.com. You can find Tim's latest work online at www.blackandwhitefineart.net
This entry was posted in Photography and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Kodak Tri-X and 35mm SLR — Best Value in Town

  1. Tim says:

    Tim,

    spot on! And the camera will likely still be working fine 5-10 years from now.

    Agree re. the WCI scans, but when you want to spend less and don’t need to print quite that large, I’ve had very good results with Imacon scans from agximaging.com, in Michigan, for $10.

    Keep up the good work,

    Rick